Now, „normal” doesn't mean bad. Quite the opposite.
As usually, this is my little review of the conference. Take into account, that with up to 5 parallel tracks, I've seen no more than 25% of the whole event.
Wojtek Erbetowski, pointed out, that as we gain knowledge, it's getting harder and harder to find something amazing at a conference. I was overwhelmed with new knowledge, the first time I went to one, but since I try to keep up to date, since I visit up to six conferences every year, and since speakers tend to give the same talks all over the country, I consider a conference fruitful if I take one thing that can help me in a substantial way.
I'm happy to report, that it was the case with GeeCON.
University Day started for me with Dierk König talking about concurrent programming in Groovy (GPars library). Dierk is a commiter to GPars and a co-author of „Groovy in Action”. Chances are, that if you're using Groovy, you already know the lib, but if you don't, it's got pretty a lot of ways to deal with parallel programming without touching threading manually. It's got STM (Software Transactional Memory), Actors, Agents, Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP), dataflow stuff and more. There's even a thing called KanbanFlow. Yeah, the Kanban in name is not accidental. And the best part: all of this is relativly easy to understand and use.
His talk was good, but to tell the truth, I've seen a GPars presentation at GeeCON 2011, by Václav Pech („Pick low-hanging fruit"), and even though Václav had just an hour, I think his talk was better.
Unfortunatelly, the following Dierk's talk: „Pro Groovy”, was both short (just 1h), and shallow. Dierk was talking about Abstract Syntax Tree transformations, but while I hoped for a show of how to write AST Transformations, Dierk managed only to show a few build in annotations, that were handled by them.
I wish Dierk was available for a whole day. If you are a planning a conference and thinking about whom to invite, please consider asking Dierk and giving him a whole day for a really pro workshop. That would make my day.
Gavin King and Stéphane Épardaud were introducing us to Ceylon, a new programming language on the JVM. If you are wondering, why should you care about this one, you shouldn't. Give it a few years, and check again. The talk was nice, though.
Bruce Eckel with „Atomic Scala”. Bruce is writing a new book, and the idea he has is to create something for complete newbies in programming, allowing them to learn Scala as the first programming language. The goal is noble, but that means you shouldn't probably buy it, because it's way faster to explain a lot of language constructs comparing to another language you know, than to explain it from the ground up. Bruce's talk was too basic even for such a dumbass as me.
Bruce also gave the opening talk “The Power of Hybridization”, the next day, and thought it lacked a thesis (Bruce had to finish at about 70%), his deep, multilingual perspective and tons of anecdotes, made it very interesting to me. By the way, if you've read about how slides should look like (no text-reading, only slogans, full screen pictures, etc.) Bruce is doing exactly the opposite thing. Nobody cares, when you have something to tell, though.
I'll skip Ivar Jacobson's “Liberating the Essence...” talk, as it lacked.. the essence. I'll also skip Gavin King's “Ceylon: the thinking behind a new language”, as it was just the same thing as with any other Java-replacement language I know of. Let's move to Adam Bien talking Web Containers and Java EE.
|Terminator @pub in Poznań|
The thing he misses, though, is that it's easier to learn and use those “other” technologies, than do proper Java EE. And yes, after years of corpo-failures, programmers tend to be biased against Java EE. Thus, while Java EE is finally good, and it makes perfect sense to stay with Java EE, if you are a Java EE master-blaster, I doubt you'll be as productive as with for example Grails. You'll do good to pick whatever you'd like to learn, and learn it throughly.
Adam's talk was refreshing. Apart from guys from SoftwareMill, I haven't seen anyone talking about Java EE 6 with such expertise and sanity.
And then came my favorite talk. Sam Newman from Thoughtworks, talked about design and architecture with emphasis on rapid release.
|Wojtek Erbetowski showing a prototype |
of an operating system on top
of a prototype of a hardware
Some of his learned lessons were:
- beware of shared lib and serialization protocols (evil for microservices)
- do not send internal representation of data across the wire (things change)
- fuck WSDL, go with simple XML, Xpath, and let every service prepare stub-tests, so you can safely change the schema when you want to
- codify the contract between services with writing a test (the reason is the same as above)
- do not share database between services; you'll make it impossible to evolve them independently; you can use one database with different schemas
- data should be owned by the service it uses (similar to above)
James Williams, talking about Ratpack. I really feel sorry for James, he made quite a trip here, but as this was the last presentation this day, and he had guys like Bruce Eckel as an alternative, not many people showed up.
I've started the last of the conference with Thomas Sundberg and his rather basic talk about all the wrong things we can do to fail a project. As there was nothing new to me, I left early. Then I moved to Kevlin Henney to listen about OOP in Java (deja-vu? not really), and to Tomasz Kowalczewski talk about Closures in Java 8. That was similar to Simon Ritter at 33rd, but focused solely on Closures. Great talk, nice stuff, Tomasz did great work, though it's a bit disappointing that functions are not going to be first class citizens. Yet.
Oh, well, no reason to go back from Groovy, I guess.
And then there was Piotr Gabryanczyk with Scala, Akka and Camel. That was also a great talk, showing simplicity of programming using those technologies. I wonder how it fits Thoughtworks' micro-services, or are we getting too close to ESB and single point of bullshit that way.
Kevlin Henney closed the conference with examples of cool code. His talk was fantastic, funny, and inspiring. Especially examples. One of the best closing talks I've seen. Thanks.
And there were parties. But that's a completely different story.
Saturday was for Open Spaces, lead by Bruce Eckel, but I couldn't attend.
PS: Some pictures are courtesy of Michał Lewandowski. I've totally forgotten my camera.